Child height predictor
Predict adult height with two published methods: Tanner & Whitehouse mid-parental height (plus 13 cm for boys, minus 13 cm for girls, ±6.5 cm range) and a simplified Khamis-Roche estimate that weights the child’s current height and age by CDC growth-chart height completion.
Runs in your browserEvery computation happens in your browser — your data never leaves this device.
Height data
Method A: Tanner & Whitehouse mid-parental height (plus 13 for boys, minus 13 for girls, ±6.5 cm). Method B: a simplified Khamis-Roche estimate weighted by CDC growth-chart height completion.
Prediction
175.5 cm169.0 cm169.0 ~ 182.0 cmEnter the child’s current height and age to run the second method as well.
What this tool does
- Curious how tall your child will end up? Start with a mid-parental range to get a realistic ballpark.
- If your child is clearly shorter or taller than peers, run the second method on current height to see how far off the range they are before booking an appointment.
- With very different parental heights, compare the boy and girl results to see where the ±13 cm sex adjustment comes from.
- When plotting a growth chart, treat the predicted range as a reference band rather than a target to chase.
Example
Input
Father 175 cm, mother 163 cm, boy; child’s current height 140 cm at age 10
Output
Method A: mid-parental height 169.0 cm, target height 175.5 cm, range 169.0 to 182.0 cm. Method B: a 10-year-old boy has reached 83% of adult height, projection from current height 168.7 cm, weighted prediction 169.8 cm, average of both methods 172.7 cm
Method A is Tanner & Whitehouse mid-parental height; method B is a simplified Khamis-Roche estimate weighted by CDC growth-chart height completion.
Frequently asked questions
How do the two methods differ?
Method A uses only parental heights: boys = (father + mother + 13) / 2, girls = (father + mother − 13) / 2, with a ±6.5 cm band, from the Tanner & Whitehouse 1976 mid-parental method. Method B is a simplified Khamis-Roche: the original equation regresses on the child’s current height, weight and mid-parental height (no bone age needed), and this tool follows the same idea by projecting current height through the proportion of adult height already attained and blending that with the parental target.
Why do boys and girls differ by 13 cm?
Because adult men and women differ by roughly 13 cm in average height, and the mid-parental method folds that straight into the formula: boys add 6.5 cm to the parental average and girls subtract 6.5 cm, which is the same as adding or subtracting 13 before halving. That is why, with identical parental heights, the boy’s target height is exactly 13 cm above the girl’s.
Where do the height-completion percentages come from?
They are median approximations from the CDC 2000 growth charts: a 2-year-old boy has reached about 50% of adult height, 83% at age 10 and essentially 100% by 17; girls mature earlier, at about 52% at age 2, 91% at 10 and essentially 100% by 14. These are population values, so early or late puberty shifts the actual timing by a year or two.
How accurate is the prediction?
It gives a range, not a number. Height is polygenic, and nutrition, sleep, exercise, chronic illness and pubertal timing all matter, so a 3–5 cm gap between the two methods is entirely normal. If a child is well below the 3rd percentile or grows less than 4–5 cm a year, see a paediatric endocrinologist.
Why does the second method need the child’s age and height?
Because the Khamis-Roche idea is that current height matters more the closer a child is to adulthood. The tool weights by the proportion of adult height already attained: a small proportion (a young child) leans on the parental target, while a proportion near 1 (late puberty) pulls the prediction towards the child’s current height.
Keywords:height predictorchild heightmid parental heightkhamis rocheadult height身高预测子女身高父母平均身高成年身高长多高遗传身高